Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Garza v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Brandon Garza
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Vazquez v. Sesco Cement, Corp.
as 4:2022cv03507
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Vazquez
Defendant:
Sesco Cement, Corp.
Ortega Pancardo v. Texas Utility Services LLC et al
as 7:2021cv00429
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ortega Pancardo
Defendant:
Texas Utility Services LLC and Gabriel Carrizales
Dumont-Demirsu v. LDC, LLC
as 4:2021cv00585
Plaintiff:
Emma-Gabriele M. Dumont-Demirsu
Defendant:
LDC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chavera v. Stand In Line Consulting, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
Gabriel Cantu and Stand In Line Consulting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Francisco Chavera
Medina et al v. Utilikon, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv03093
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Medina , Jose David Aguilar , Wilmer Gavarrete and others
Defendant:
Utilikon, LLC and Chagnon Dean Early
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garcia et al v. Peterson et al
as 4:2017cv01601
Defendant:
Vasilia Peterson, Robert Peterson, Ormando Gomez and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia , Mark Wilburn , Jose Luis Vazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hopkins v. Incarnation Home Health Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00331
Plaintiff:
Angela Hopkins
Defendant:
Incarnation Home Health Services, Inc., Opeoluwa Edun and Gabriel Faturoti
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Lazo et al v. M&G Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Sergio Lazo , Robert Mejia , Ricky Lee Vasquez and others
Defendant:
M&G Corporation, Integrity Mechanical Specialists, LLC, Richard Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Diaz et al v. Strong A/C and Refrigeration, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Luis Diaz , Gabriel Cisneros and Jose Serna
Defendant:
Strong A/C and Refrigeration, LLC and Darin Strong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
