Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Amaro-Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00207
Petitioner:
Aracelia Amaro-Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Benitez v. JLA Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00499
Plaintiff:
Modesto Benitez
Defendant:
JLA Enterprises, Inc. and Jose Lino Amaro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Amaro et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jesus V Amaro and Andrea Amaro
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and John Doe Security Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amaro et al v. Wilmington Trust NA et al
as 1:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Carlos Enriquez Amaro and Odella M. De Amaro
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation and Wilmington Trust, NA
Counter_claimant:
Wilmington Trust, NA
Counter_defendant:
Carlos Enriquez Amaro and Odella M. De Amaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Amaro v. Livingston
as 2:2014cv00382
Petitioner:
Gilbert Amaro
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Estrada et al v. Houston Pizza Venture, LP et al
as 3:2013cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jose Estrada , Miguel Reyna Amaro and Edgar Palacios
Defendant:
Houston Pizza Venture, LP, HPV-C, LLC, HPV Staff LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Amaro et al v. JCZZ L.L.C. et al
as 4:2011cv00670
Plaintiff:
Simplicio Amaro and Cesar Romero Barrera
Defendant:
JCZZ L.L.C., T & M Lucky, Inc., Mei Fu Cheng and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Amaro v. HSMTX/Stallones-Tomball, LLC
as 4:2009cv00477
Defendant:
HSMTX/Stallones-Tomball, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mayra Amaro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Amaro v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 4:2008cv03730
Plaintiff:
Randolph James Amaro
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lumberas-Amaro v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2008cv01488
Petitioner:
Rafael Lumberas-Amaro
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
