Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Mackintosh v. Apple Inc et al
as 4:2022cv03978
Plaintiff:
Adam John Mackintosh
Defendant:
Apple Inc, Uber Technologies Inc., Uber Health LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Barysas v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 4:2022cv03876
Plaintiff:
Dainius Barysas
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hicks v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
as 4:2022cv02637
Plaintiff:
Anetra Hicks
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, UBER USA, LLC, Rasier, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Fontenot v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01300
Plaintiff:
Theophilius Fontenot
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Progressive Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Robinson v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv04003
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shalorea Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hearn v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2021cv03465
Plaintiff:
Roy Hearn
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Uber Technologies. Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv03205
Plaintiff:
Deirdre Johnson
Defendant:
Uber Technologies. Inc., Rasier LLC and Agba Rowland MBA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosales et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Rosa Maria Rosales and Guadalupe S. Esparza
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Lyft Inc and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Doe 1 et al v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02285
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc., Lyft Inc and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jien v. Hidat et al
as 4:2020cv04030
Plaintiff:
Wei Jien
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Girma Gonfa Hidat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
