Cases 11 - 20 of 714
Lacy v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Dana Sullivan, Nurse Practitioner Crystal Mable, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taddia v. Warden Metz et al
as 4:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Elio Taddia
Defendant:
Warden Metz, Provider Rudi, Nurse Practitioner Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Warden Jerry Sanchez, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00742
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norred v. TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit et al
as 4:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Norred
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit, UTMB Correctional Division, Dr. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Barry
as 5:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Tim McCoy Barton
Respondent:
Waylon Barry Warden and Waylon Barry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Herod v. Warden Amunet;
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Herod
Respondent:
Warden Amunet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Hayward et al
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Warden Hayward, E.R. Delta, Walle Delta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keaton v. Dolly et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Keaton
Defendant:
Captain Dolly and Warden Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fabbri v. Sgt. Edwina D. Bryant et al
as 4:2023cv04724
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fabbri
Defendant:
Sgt. Edwina D. Bryant, Sgt. Giselle Njimitchoufong, Warden Quintanal Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
