Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. McCombs
as 4:2019cv00828
Defendant:
Mr. Steward Carlson McCombs
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Shenzhen Tomota Logistics Co., Ltd.
as 4:2019cv00484
Defendant:
Shenzhen Tomata Logistics Co. Ltd. and Shenzhen Tomota Logistics Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ExxonMobil Canada Ltd. et al v. Polygon PNG, L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv00884
Defendant:
Priorat Partners, L.P., Bernard Selz, John J. Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and ExxonMobil Canada Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Justice v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 4:2017cv03660
Plaintiff:
Theodore Justice
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Justice v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 4:2017mc03101
Plaintiff:
Theodore Justice
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv03302
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gow et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00621
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gow and Andrew Gow
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Magellan Behavioral Health, Inc. and Magellan Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
