Cases 21 - 30 of 176
Harrison v. Montgomery County Jail
as 4:2021cv03548
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harrison v. Montgomery County
as 4:2021cv03408
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison et al v. Crace et al
as 4:2021cv03335
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Harrison and Thomas Damgaard
Defendant:
Jaon L. Crace, Charitable Planning Services, Cobblestone Trustee Services and others
Interested Party:
Magnus Damgaard, Julie Damgaard and Steven Still
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. Melton Truck Lines, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv00340
Plaintiff:
David Flores
Defendant:
Melton Truck Lines, Inc., Dante Jovon Harrison, Liberty Truck & Trailer Leasing & Sales, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Enax
as 4:2021cv02960
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Blak Enax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Enax
as 4:2021cv02928
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Blak Enax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Pace et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:21-cv-2457). CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:21-cv-2436).
as 4:2021cv02457
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Harrison
Defendant:
Jared T. S. Pace, Condon Tobin Sladek Thornton and FCI Lender Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harrison v. Pace et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:12-cv-2435. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:21-cv-2436.
as 4:2021cv02435
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Harrison
Defendant:
Jared T.S. Pace and Condon Tobin Sladek Thornton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv02362
Petitioner:
Gregory Harrison
Respondent:
Director TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. Dr. Wendy M. Elliott, PHD
as 4:2021cv02316
Plaintiff:
Delwin L. Harrison
Defendant:
Dr. Wendy M. Elliott, PHD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
