Cases 31 - 40 of 123
Jackson v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Terry Lee Johnson, Toms, William Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. ASI Lloyds
as 3:2020cv00339
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds
Plaintiff:
Ken Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lemire v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Angela N Chevalier, Unknown Female Correctional Officer, Marcus I Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth John Lemire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Armstrong Field Services, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv03722
Defendant:
Armstrong Field Services, LLC, Joshua David Armstrong and Christopher Chase Roles
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2020cv00290
Defendant:
Tahirah Anderson, Gerardo Gomez, Betsy Zachariah and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennemer v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00260
Defendant:
Major Chibuike Onwuka, Warden Patricia Demerson, Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
John David Kennemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saenz et al v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv02575
Plaintiff:
Earl McBride, Jr., Savorge Lee Curl, Larry Gross and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and Katherine Pitman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rike v. Collier et al
as 3:2020cv00224
Defendant:
Medical Dept., Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, UTMB Legal Department and others
Plaintiff:
James E Rike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. LPL Financial LLC
as 3:2020cv00041
Plaintiff:
Lois Armstrong
Defendant:
LPL Financial LLC and Roy Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMF Capital LLC v. LM Armstrong/Bridgeford Construction, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00251
Plaintiff:
BMF Capital LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Wayne Bridgeford and LM Armstrong/Bridgeford Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
