Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2011cv04642
Plaintiff:
Kevin Moore
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2010cv00354
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Richey
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mosby et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv03972
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mosby and James Ward
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. United States et al
as 2:2010cv00119
Petitioner:
Neil Phillips
Respondent:
United States , Federal Bureau of Prisons and Dan Joslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 4:2010cv01566
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dewayne Moore
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salinas v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00031
Petitioner:
Alfredo Salinas
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Dan Joslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garza v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00033
Petitioner:
Humberto Garza
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Dan Joslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barrios v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00032
Petitioner:
Johnny Barrios
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Dan Joslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Huff, II v. Neil et al
as 4:2009cv02000
Plaintiff:
James Eli Huff, II
Defendant:
Toni Neil, Scott Fauver, Unknown Named Federal Bureau Of Prisons Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Makeba Dehron Thomas
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
