Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Richards v. Hearn et al
as 4:2020cv03684
Plaintiff:
Billy Richards and Billy Holmes
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Charles J. Hearn and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Al's Trucking, Inc et al
as 4:2020cv02489
Defendant:
UV Logistics, LLC d/b/a United Vision Logistics i, Al's Trucking, Inc, Clarence Holmes, III and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes Prosthetic Center L.L.C. v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
as 4:2020cv01633
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and Zurich American Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Holmes Prosthetic Center L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smothermon et al v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 4:2019cv04498
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company and Jamal Holmes
Plaintiff:
David Smothermon and Angela Smothermon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. ME ALPHA I, LLC
as 4:2019cv04395
Defendant:
ME ALPHA I, LLC
Plaintiff:
MARQUES HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2019cv04393
Defendant:
ME ALPHA I, LLC, MARQUES HOLMES and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Holmes v. Pollock
as 4:2019cv04445
Defendant:
Detective John Pollock
Plaintiff:
Charles Womba Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starkey v. Collier et al
as 4:2019cv04055
Plaintiff:
Brock Andrew Starkey
Defendant:
Dr Lannette Linthicum, John Doe, Seung Taek Lim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Mofidinasab v. Chaplain Holmes et al
as 4:2019cv03518
Respondent:
Chaplain Holmes, Srgt Hightower and Chaplain Gambriel
Petitioner:
Hani Mafidinasab and Hani Mofidinasab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
