Cases 41 - 50 of 1,542
Teran et al v. OneMain Financial Services, Inc.
as 7:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Roberto H. Teran and Alicia B. Teran
Defendant:
OneMain Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lefoldt, Jr. v. Boudreaux et al
as 4:2023cv03331
Plaintiff:
H. Kenneth Lefoldt, Jr.
Defendant:
Brent Boudreaux, George Henry, Warren Stephen Orlando and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Reiff v. Herrera Esquivel et al
as 1:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Joan Reiff and Joan H. Reiff
Defendant:
Transportes Cadega SA de CV and Candido Herrera Esquivel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jones v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 4:2023cv03298
Plaintiff:
James H Jones
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office and Methodist Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Casey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03118
Petitioner:
Tony H Casey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
