Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Ortiz v. Warden Sifuentes et al
as 3:2011cv00252
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
Warden Sifuentes, Lt. James and Unknown Members of Unit, Classification Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jingles v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2011cv01474
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jingles
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Huntsville Classification and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Thaler et al
as 4:2011cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Porter
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Ms. Woods and TDCJ-CID Estelle Unit Classification Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitfield v. Director TDCJ et al
as 3:2010cv00577
Plaintiff:
Robert Whitfield
Defendant:
Director TDCJ and TDCJ Classification and Records Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mejia v. State Classification Chief Bot Whare House
as 4:2010cv02216
Plaintiff:
John Mejia
Defendant:
State Classification Chief Bot Whare House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Thaler et al
as 4:2010cv00495
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Lt. Houston, CO Tutler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Officer Pople et al
as 4:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Acosta, III
Defendant:
Officer Pople, Chaney, Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Tutler et al
as 4:2009cv04013
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
Tutler, A Houston, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Medical Department et al
as 4:2009cv03602
Plaintiff:
Johnny Marcum
Defendant:
Medical Department and Unit Classification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice State Classification Committee et al
as 4:2009cv01654
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice State Classification Committee, Moore, Kevin Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
