Cases 41 - 50 of 724
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Sammiego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Amonet et al
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Adrian Amonet, Assistant Warden P. Samaniego and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laws v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2023cv03686
Plaintiff:
Randall Glen Laws and Randell Glen Laws
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Kelly Strong, Major Canul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shinall v. Muniz et al
as 4:2023cv03652
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Shinall
Defendant:
Warden Donald Muniz, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Hanson
as 2:2023cv00243
Petitioner:
Mario A Perez
Respondent:
Warden Ralph Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Albarran v. Bearsley
as 2:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Israel Albarran
Respondent:
Warden Bearsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frankenfield v. Metz et al
as 4:2023cv03478
Plaintiff:
Brian Frankenfield
Defendant:
Warden K. Metz and Others Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Warden Garrett et al
as 4:2023cv03481
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mobley
Defendant:
Warden Garrett, Mrs. Nichols, Dept. of Justice-DOJ Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patton v. Fikes;
as 2:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Tyran Patton
Respondent:
Warden Fikes and Warden Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hedspeth v. FPC Bryan Warden
as 4:2023cv03408
Petitioner:
Timeiki Hedspeth
Respondent:
FPC Bryan Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
