Cases 71 - 80 of 868
Jackson v. State of Texas
as 2:2022cv00305
Petitioner:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Official Personal State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Five Guys Properties, LLC d/b/a Five Guys Burgers and Fries
as 4:2022cv04381
Plaintiff:
Jaharrah Jackson
Defendant:
Five Guys Properties, LLC d/b/a Five Guys Burgers and Fries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jacks et al v. OakBend Medical Center
as 4:2022cv04386
Plaintiff:
James Jacks and Darren Jackson
Defendant:
OakBend Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jackson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez and Placido Samaniego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Waller
as 4:2022cv04357
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Detention Officer Waller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv04261
Plaintiff:
Tulla Jackson
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Garza v Mike Armstrong et al
as 3:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
Sandy Veronica Garza
Defendant:
Mike Armstrong, George Forster, Gary Wasek and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jackson v. United States et al
as 4:2022cv04225
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC,
as 4:2022cv04126
Plaintiff:
Angie Jackson
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jackson v. United States
as 4:2022cv03989
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
