Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Berry et al v. ADT Security Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
Danielle Berry, McKinley Berry, Lawrence Berry and others
Defendant:
Nick Marcoulier and ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fontenot v. ADT Security Services, LLC
as 4:2018cv01439
Plaintiff:
Latonia Fontenot
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cabrera v. ADT Security Services, Inc. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 4:2011cv03483
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Cabrera
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khan et al v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2010cv03744
Plaintiff:
Usman Khan and Noreen Khan
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valbruna Stainless Inc v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 4:2010cv02513
Plaintiff:
Valbruna Stainless Inc
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc and ADT Holdings Inc
Counter_claimant:
ADT Security Services Inc
Counter_defendant:
Valbruna Stainless Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gellman v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2010mc00237
Plaintiff:
Tobi Gellman
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Movant:
Susan Asmanovs
Nacol & Co. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00137
Plaintiff:
Nacol & Co.
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sun Packing, Inc. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2008cv03018
Plaintiff:
Sun Packing, Inc.
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sekil v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00510
Plaintiff:
Yusuph Sekil and Hiphop Fashions
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
