Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Garcia v. Lumpkin; Do not docket in 2:24-cv-110. Case is consolidated under 2:24-cv-108.
as 2:2024cv00110
Petitioner: Antoino Andres Garcia
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant: U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Garcia
as 4:2019cv01530
Defendant: Andres Garcia d/b/a All Care EMS
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Andres Garcia v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 4:2018cv04042
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff: Andres Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Garcia d/b/a All Care EMS
as 4:2017cv01202
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Andres Garcia d/b/a All Care EMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Garcia et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 4:2017cv01162
Plaintiff: Andres Garcia and Janet Burtzlaff
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia-Muniz v. Hanson
as 2:2017cv00131
Petitioner: Rolando Andres Garcia-Muniz
Respondent: R Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garcia-Muniz v. Musquiz C. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00079
Plaintiff: Rolando Andres Garcia-Muniz
Defendant: Musquiz C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serment v. Celanese Corporation
as 2:2017cv00017
Plaintiff: Edward Serment , Aaron W Dorman , Maurice Donger and others
Defendant: Celanese Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garcia-Vela v. United States of America
as 7:2014cv00541
Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: Andres Garcia-Vela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?