Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00850
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00867
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Devillier et al v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
as 3:2020cv00223
Defendant:
THE STATE OF TEXAS
Plaintiff:
Richard & Wendy Devillier, Yale Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kyle H. Devillier, Chris & Darla Barrow and others
Interested Party:
CivilCorp, LLC and City of Anahuac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Atwood v. Christopher et al
as 4:2020cv01368
Plaintiff:
David Ray Atwood
Defendant:
Captain Cory Webb, Warden Steve McClarin, Ex Director Bryon Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atwood v. Punch et al
as 4:2018cv01844
Plaintiff:
David Ray Atwood
Defendant:
Ronald C Punch, Dolye Davis, Mattew K. McClarin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atwood v. Punch et al
as 4:2018cv01711
Plaintiff:
David Ray Atwood
Defendant:
Ronald C Punch, Doyle Davis, Matthew K. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Eudy v. University Of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 3:2015cv00214
Petitioner:
David Ray Eudy
Defendant:
University Of Texas Medical Branch, Gary Wright, Virginia Shafer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
People's United Equipment Finance Corp. v. Huffman
as 4:2014cv02629
Plaintiff:
People's United Equipment Finance Corp.
Defendant:
David Ray Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atwood v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv01414
Petitioner:
David Ray Atwood
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
