Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Holmes v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Transel Chanta Holmes
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Perry v. John B. Holmes et al
as 4:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Gerald Allen Perry
Defendant:
John B. Holmes, Ken R. Williamson, Boyd Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Warden Jerry Sanchez, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Amonett et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Tabari S. Strong
Defendant:
Byran Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Adrian Amonett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Flores et al
as 2:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Albert Shane Lester
Defendant:
Steven A Flores, Elbert Holmes and Candice G Flannel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thibeaux v. Finner et al
as 4:2023cv03783
Plaintiff:
Rayfield J Thibeaux
Defendant:
Troy Finner, Two Unknown Arresting Police Officers and John Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego, Dr Issac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amezquita v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Richard Luis Amezquita
Defendant:
E Holmes, Crystal Breauz, Isaac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beason v. Warden Holmes
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Gary Don Beason
Defendant:
Warden Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
