Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rodriguez v. State Farm Lloyds
as 7:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Francisco J Rodriguez
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv04519
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Jones
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden R. Bowers, J Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2022cv04252
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, Warden R. Bowers, C Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2021cv02279
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, J Rodriguez, D. Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. O'Bryant et al
as 4:2021cv01403
Defendant:
Officer R. Coleman, Rocky Moore, J. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.176 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2021cv00002
Defendant:
JUANA R. BRISENO, Ameida Salinas, Starr County Tax Assessor-Collector, ESTELLA R. MORENO and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Jones v. Moull et al
as 4:2020cv04188
Defendant:
P Colemon, J Rodriguez, B Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rehabilitation, LLC et al v. Rodriguez Toro et al
as 4:2020cv02132
Defendant:
Erick J. Rodriguez & Asociados and Erick J. Rodriguez Toro
Plaintiff:
Inland Pipe Rehabilitation, LLC, Erick McCrae and Robert McCrae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mott v. Oputa et al
as 3:2018cv00158
Plaintiff:
Austin Mott, Jr
Defendant:
Oyinkuro H Oputa, Mary A King, Dale A Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
