Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shaw v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2020cv02972
Defendant:
U.T.M.B, State of Texas and TDCJ-ID
Plaintiff:
Oscar L Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Davis
as 3:2019cv00182
Respondent:
Lori Davis
Petitioner:
David L. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawley v. Landsey, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01918
Plaintiff:
James Hawley
Defendant:
Floyd A Landsey, Inc. and Ethan L Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice- Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID) et al
as 4:2011cv01448
Plaintiff:
Oscar L Shaw
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice- Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID), Rick Thaler, David Sweetin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv05044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Shaw v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 4:2009cv01890
Plaintiff:
Oscar L Shaw
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Douglas Appel, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Texas Department et al
as 4:2007cv01996
Plaintiff:
Oscar L Shaw
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Alfonso Castillo, Robert J Jenkins, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division et al
as 4:2007cv01719
Plaintiff:
Oscar L Shaw
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division, Nathaniel Quarterman, Tim Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blackwood et al v. The Coffee Beanery LTD et al
as 6:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Kenneth T. Blackwood, Jr. and Laura M. Deming
Defendant:
The Coffee Beanery LTD, The Coffee Beanery LTD, Joanne Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
