Cases 1 - 10 of 724
Davis v. UCC et al
as 4:2024cv03515
Defendant:
STG/G.I/OIG, TDCJ, UCC and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anduha v. Hall
as 4:2024cv03466
Respondent:
Warden Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Marlene Anduha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hastey v. Hall
as 4:2024cv03351
Respondent:
Warden Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Hope Leticia Hastey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adams v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Adams
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tyson v. Hall
as 4:2024cv02818
Respondent:
Warden Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Wyvonne Tyson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Murphy v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv02828
Defendant:
Assistant Director Dickerson, Warden Chavelier, Dr. Martha Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
John Eldridge Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcala v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2024cv02463
Defendant:
Sgt. Williams, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alcala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00147
Defendant:
Dentist Mark Mery, Clinical Manager Crystal Breaux, Candice Hannel and others
Plaintiff:
Destry Earl Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Defendant:
Justice Greg Abbott, Linda C. Cruz, Assistant Warden Candice Hannel and others
Plaintiff:
Destry Earl Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Quiroga et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Defendant:
Major Victor Quiroga and Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
