Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Valero Marketing and Supply Company v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Valero Marketing and Supply Company
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Excise Tax
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GPI TX-F, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Shamaley Ford, L.P., Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and GPI TX-F, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
FILING ERROR
as 1:2021cv00328
Defendant:
Quentin Antan Mitchell and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Mitchell v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00330
Plaintiff:
Quentin Antwan Mitchell
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States of America v. Cain
as 5:2021cv00201
3Rd Party Defendant:
414 Bentley Manor Holdings, LLC, Forestt Ronald Cain, George LaHood and others
Defendant:
Gary L. Cain
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Byrd v. Global Recovery Group LLC et al
as 5:2020cv01020
Plaintiff:
Randall L Byrd
Defendant:
Global Recovery Group LLC et al, Global Recovery Group LLC and United States International Development Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Tatum et al
as 5:2020cv00907
Defendant:
Leslie Tatum and Living Health Holistic Healing Center
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Travalino
as 4:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Michael Marc Travalino and Mark White Eagle
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America vs. $526,758.69
as 1:2020cv00525
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Respondent:
$526,758.69 and $10,515.23
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Jerome v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00253
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Jerome
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
