Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Diaz-Contreras v. United States of America
as 7:2019cv00017
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Luciano Diaz-Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Diaz Vargas v. USA
as 2:2017cv00066
Petitioner:
Salvador Diaz Vargas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diaz v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv00585
Plaintiff:
Jason Arriaga Diaz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Valle-Diaz v. United States of America.
as 3:2016cv00383
Respondent:
United States of America.
Petitioner:
Mercy Valle-Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00756
Petitioner:
Isaac Lupe Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diaz v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv00733
Plaintiff:
Jason Arriaga Diaz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diaz-Lario v. USA
as 2:2015cv00038
Petitioner:
Mauricio Alexander Diaz-Lario
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Aguilar Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00109
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Aguilar Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diaz v. United States Of America
as 5:2014cv00044
Plaintiff:
Alberto Vasquez Diaz
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diaz v. United States Of America
as 7:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Tomas Daniel Diaz
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
