Cases 131 - 140 of 7,605
Clay v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Talamantez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01402
Petitioner:
Ruben Talamantez, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Sheriff, Wayne Dicky
as 5:2023cv01530
Petitioner:
Earnest Key Johnson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paredes Garcia v. Rosales et al
as 1:2023cv01361
Petitioner:
Pablo Paredes Garcia
Respondent:
Geraldo Rosales and FNU Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sterling v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00842
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Sterling
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strong v. Wiles
as 3:2023cv00415
Petitioner:
Willie Lee Strong
Respondent:
Sheriff of El Paso Richard Wiles and Richard Wiles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Conlin v. Criner et al
as 7:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Jeremy L Conlin
Defendant:
Sheriff David Criner, Midland County and D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Murphy v. Cueto et al
as 5:2023cv01501
Petitioner:
David Preston Murphy
Respondent:
Edmundo Cueto and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00427
Petitioner:
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
