Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Adams v. McLane
as 1:2023cv01447
Petitioner:
Darnell Iven Adams
Respondent:
Marsha McLane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nesby v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01101
Petitioner:
Rodgy Lee Nesby
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Respondent:
Warden Adam Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kozitzki v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
Michael Adam Kozitzki
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garner v. Midland Police Department et al
as 7:2022cv00156
Petitioner:
Dewey Adam Garner
Respondent:
Midland Police Department, State of Texas County of Midland Prosecutors Office, Midland Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Noureddine v. Lange
as 6:2022cv00449
Petitioner:
Adam Noureddine
Respondent:
Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Caton v. Salazar
as 5:2022cv00177
Petitioner:
Adam Caton
Respondent:
Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 1:2021cv00763
Petitioner:
Alton Curley Adams
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kozitzki v Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00384
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Michael Adam Kozitzki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Sherman Ernesto Robinson
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00215
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
