Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ragan v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00317
Petitioner:
Lonnie Gene Ragan
Respondent:
Kelly R. Metz and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Yezak
as 6:2022cv00614
Petitioner:
Mike Anthony Kelly
Respondent:
Sheriff Gerald Yezak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Meinert v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00112
Petitioner:
Kelli E. Meinert
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leonard Kelly Huff, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-CID
as 5:2019cv01064
Petitioner:
Leonard Kelly Huff, Jr.
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amos v. The State of Texas
as 7:2018cv00024
Petitioner:
Kelly Amos
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolfenberger v. Collier
as 6:2017cv00205
Respondent:
Director TDCJ Bryan Collier
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Eugene Kelly Wolfenberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amos v. Painter
as 7:2017cv00056
Petitioner:
Kelly Amos
Respondent:
Gary Painter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunn v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00239
Petitioner:
Misty D. Nunn
Respondent:
Kelly Strong and Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00376
Petitioner:
Terrence Dewaine Kelly
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00375
Petitioner:
Terrence Dewaine Kelly
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
