Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Lopez v. Lumpkin
as 7:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Christopher Phillip Lopez
Respondent:
Director TDCJ Bryan Colier and Director TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Reynolds
as 5:2023cv01340
Petitioner:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Respondent:
Sheriff Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Reynolds, et al.
as 5:2023cv00517
Petitioner:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phillips, pre-1933 Private American National v. Biden et al
as 6:2023cv00218
Petitioner:
Christopher-Allen: Phillips, pre-1933 Private American National
Respondent:
Joseph Robinett Biden, Donald E. Muniz, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Reynolds
as 5:2022cv00836
Petitioner:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Reynolds
as 5:2022cv00781
Petitioner:
Phillip G. Scott
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Reynolds
as 5:2022cv00743
Petitioner:
Phillip G. Scott
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Reynolds, et al. et al
as 5:2022cv00235
Petitioner:
Phillip G. Scott
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds, Judicial Districts of Comal County, TX, County Attorneys of Comal County, TX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00264
Petitioner:
Courtney Reagan Phillips
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Davis
as 5:2019cv00165
Petitioner:
Frank Deon Phillips
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
