Cases 1 - 10 of 7,601
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00615
Petitioner:
Gerald Wilson Thomas
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villafranco Jr. v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Jesse Villafranco Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Joel Campbell
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Karen Noemi Hernandez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Luther Dwayne Parks
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Luther Dwayne Parks
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blake v. Rosalez
as 5:2024cv00498
Petitioner:
Robert Timothy Blake
Respondent:
Warden G. Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Avila v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 5:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
James Anthony Avila
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
