Cases 1 - 10 of 7,674
Carpenter v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Ms. Jerriod Carpenter
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCormick v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00044
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Joseph McCormick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blankenship v. Western District of Texas
as 7:2024cv00226
Respondent:
Western District of Texas
Petitioner:
Dominique Marquis Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roberson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00476
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Stanley Bruce Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cato v. Texas
as 1:2024cv01107
Petitioner:
Avery Cato
Respondent:
Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valdes Cruz v. Humphrey
as 5:2024cv01029
Defendant:
Warden C. Humphrey
Petitioner:
Silvio Valdes Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hardy, Sr. v. State of Texas
as 6:2024cv00469
Respondent:
State of Texas
Petitioner:
Demond Hardy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
Roy Edward Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardy v. Lange
as 1:2024cv01081
Petitioner:
Demond Hardy
Respondent:
Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kilgore-Bey et al v. Garland
as 3:2024cv00328
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
Petitioner:
Ismael Zambada and Cleveland Kilgore-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
