Cases 121 - 130 of 19,689
Enriquez v. Mares
as 6:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Respondent:
Warden FNU Mares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Balderas v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Balderas, Jr.
Defendant:
David Gonzales and Carlos Omar Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Disciplinary Dept. of TDCJ
as 5:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Disciplinary Dept. of TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Reynolds and Ofc. FNU Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobek v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dobek
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Quintanilla v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Daniel Quintanilla
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hollenbeck v. State of Texas
as 1:2024cv00391
Petitioner:
Tae Hollenbeck
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hollenbeck v. Lange
as 6:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Tae Hollenbeck
Defendant:
State of Texas
Respondent:
Sheriff Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
