Cases 11 - 20 of 291
Edwards v. Quarterman
as 3:2010cv00347
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Edwards
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman v. Board of Pardon & Parole et al
as 1:2010cv00572
Respondent:
Board of Pardon & Parole, Nathaniel Quarterman and Warden Williams
Petitioner:
Norman Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Quarterman
as 1:2010cv00509
Petitioner:
Sammie Coleman
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Thaler
as 1:2010cv00510
Petitioner:
Sammie Coleman
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Quarterman
as 1:2010cv00508
Petitioner:
Sammie Coleman
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v.Thaler
as 1:2010cv00401
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Lee, Jr.
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Royal v. Grounds et al
as 6:2010cv00136
Defendant:
Bill Aerce, Stephan Fullman, Charles Griffin, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Royal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Thaler
as 1:2010cv00236
:
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pitonyak v. Thaler
as 1:2010cv00081
Petitioner:
Colton Aaron Pitonyak and Colton Aaron Pitonyak
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aguirre v. Quarterman
as 1:2010cv00072
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Aguirre
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
