Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Padilla v. US District Court et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv01121
Plaintiff: Ismael Padilla
Defendant: Prison Litigation Reform Act of hte United States of America, U.S.A., US District Court, 5th Cir. Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archer v. U.S.A.
as 5:2018cv01032
Defendant: U.S.A.
Plaintiff: Lawrence Archer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Espinoza v. Congress of the U.S.A., etc.
as 5:2018cv00350
Defendant: Congress of the U.S.A., etc.
Plaintiff: John C. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Garcia v. U.S.A.
as 1:2014cv00108
Petitioner: Alejandro Perez-Garcia
Respondent: U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sifuentes v. U.S.A.
as 5:2013cv00723
Plaintiff: Ricardo Sifuentes
Defendant: U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Giron v. U.S.A.
as 5:2013cv00078
Plaintiff: Sergio Adelson Giron
Defendant: U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kerr v. U.S.A.
as 1:2012cv00513
Petitioner: Milton Kerr
Respondent: U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Patel v. U.S.A.
as 1:2011cv00896
Petitioner: Kamel Patel
Respondent: U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mikel v. McCabe Center et al
as 1:2010cv00079
Defendant: Bush Administration, McCabe Center and U.S.A.
Plaintiff: Jim Mikel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mikel v. Republican Party et al
as 1:2009cv00286
Plaintiff: Jim Mikel
Defendant: Republican Party, George Bush, Sr., George W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?