Cases 11 - 20 of 19,673
Powell v. Hall et al
as 6:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Reggie Montel Powell
Defendant:
Billy Ray Hall, Bell County Law Enforcement Center and Officer S. Blue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Powell vs. Fernandes et al
as 6:2024cv00291
Defendant:
Reggie Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Adeluola et al
as 7:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Joe Arnold Medina
Defendant:
Corporal FNU Adeluola, Officer FNU Vela and Nurse Maria Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villafranco Jr. v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Jesse Villafranco Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrera v. Rush et al
as 7:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge James Rush, Dusty Gallivan, Melissa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Sarinana
as 5:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Hancock
Defendant:
Police Officer T. Sarinana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandoval v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jason Sandoval
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bonner v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Alfred Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Joel Campbell
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
