Cases 21 - 30 of 291
McClure v. Quarterman
as 5:2010cv00043
Petitioner:
Robert Troy McClure
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lujan v. Quarterman et al
as 3:2010cv00012
Petitioner:
David Lujan
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and R. Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pulido v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00462
Petitioner:
Jose Ines Pulido
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2009cv00061
Petitioner:
Robert Lopez
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Linda D. Carranza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00830
Petitioner:
Charles Boyd Neal
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donoho v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00806
Petitioner:
David Allen Donoho
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wyatt v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2009cv00779
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Wyatt
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Brad Livingston, Rissie Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Livingston et al
as 1:2009cv00740
Plaintiff:
Gerald Anthony Wright
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, William H. Brooks, Nathaniel Quarterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manson v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00673
Petitioner:
Joseph Manson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montez v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00671
Petitioner:
Manuel Montez
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
