Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Walters v. Meyers, et al
as 6:2015cv00004
Defendant:
Dr. Randall Meyers and Theodore Nasiotis
Plaintiff:
Mark Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. United States Of America
as 6:2014cv00383
Petitioner:
Randall Wayne Havens
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Randall v. United States Of America
as 7:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrell Randall
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jordan v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00671
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. Stephens
as 6:2013cv00328
Petitioner:
Randall Shane Cox
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laster v. Livingston
as 4:2013cv00047
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Randall Lee Laster
Respondent:
Director Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acosta v. McNeill et al
as 3:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Arnulfo Acosta
Defendant:
Elmore County, Alabama and J. Randall McNeill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pogue v. United States Of America
as 6:2013cv00054
Petitioner:
Clifford Randall Pogue
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Douglas v. Thaler
as 5:2012cv01201
Petitioner:
Randall Dale Douglas
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. USA
as 2:2012cv00078
Petitioner:
Joe Randall Baker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
