Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Mendez-Trevino v. USA
as 2:2016cv00023
Petitioner:
Jesus German Mendez-Trevino
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Trevino v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00439
Petitioner:
Jesse Trevino
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Trevino v. USA
as 4:2014cv00058
Petitioner:
Reynaldo Ybarra Trevino
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Calderon v. Ables et al
as 5:2014cv00427
Defendant:
Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Bruce Curry, Phil Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Calderon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. McKenney et al
as 5:2014cv00036
Defendant:
Ray Harris Adams, Rebecca P. Bustamante, Anthony J. Colton and others
Plaintiff:
Orlin J. Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Espinoza et al
as 5:2013cv00536
Defendant:
Robert R. Boheman, Officer John Doe, Robert N. Espinoza and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fish v. LeBlanc
as 1:2012cv00839
Petitioner:
Darryl D. Fish
Respondent:
James M. LeBlanc and Capt. Trevino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Franco v. United States Of America
as 7:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Filomeno Trevino Franco
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Trevino v. United States Of America
as 1:2012cv00384
Petitioner:
Arturo Salvador Trevino
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Franco v. United States Of America
as 7:2012cv00035
Plaintiff:
Filomeno Trevino Franco
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
