Cases 31 - 40 of 633
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. TDCJ
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Mikey Ray Taylor, Jr. and Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
TDCJ and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Anton Juel Henry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Juan J. Sanchez
Defendant:
Diana Cruz, M. Machado, Shirley W. Buttz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berrocal v. Salazar
as 5:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Henry B. Berrocal
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
