Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Morgan v. Swicegood et al
as 1:2019cv00463
Defendant:
Richard Alford, Erica Swicegood and T Chudej
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Southwestern Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv00195
Defendant:
Southwestern Corrections, Lieutenant Brian Blanchard, Unknown Nurses and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Eugene Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fain v. Davis
as 1:2019cv00209
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Roger Eugene Fain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Faber v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
Scott Eugene Faber
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harris v. Southwestern Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00357
Defendant:
Nurse Doe 1, Southwestern Corrections, Capt. FNU Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Eugene Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fain v. Keller et al
as 1:2018cv01010
Defendant:
Justice David Newell, Justice Elsa Alcala, Justice Scott Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Eugene Fain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kadinger v. Warden Driscoll et al
as 4:2018cv00023
Respondent:
Barnard, Warden Driscoll, Glassgow and others
Petitioner:
Brian Eugene Kadinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Ballesteros et al
as 1:2018cv00121
Defendant:
Adan Ballesteros, Constable FNU Guerreo, Sheriff Sally Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2018cv00104
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stafford v. City of Odessa, Texas et al
as 7:2017cv00256
Defendant:
Lawrence Barber, District Attorney Bobby Bland and Assistant, City of Odessa, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Stafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
