Cases 41 - 50 of 365
Smith v. Hernandez et al
as 4:2022cv00023
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Respondent:
Chief Hernandez, Officer Erik Rodriguez and Chief FNU Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dominguez et al
as 4:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Respondent:
Sheriff Danny Dominguez and Jail Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Salazar
as 5:2022cv00531
Petitioner:
Christian Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gulley v. England et al
as 6:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Britney B. Gulley
Defendant:
Warden Audrey England, Sgt Kyleen Tyson, C.O. Bryce R Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurdsman v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Rodney A. Hurdsman
Defendant:
Brock Smith, Gregory Lowery, Sharon Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Reynolds et al
as 6:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Lovie Denise Smith
Defendant:
Michelle Reynolds, Donald Reynolds and Uncaged Minds Publishing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
John Sparks
Defendant:
Brian Smith, Tammy Mitchell, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Midland, Texas et al
as 7:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Marquel Smith
Defendant:
Midland, Texas, City of Midland and Midland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00340
Petitioner:
Ronny Gene Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher v. Smith
as 5:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Terrell Fisher
Defendant:
Robert M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
