Cases 51 - 60 of 174
Ortiz v. Griffis et al
as 7:2020cv00191
Defendant:
Captain Steven McNeill, Chief Deputy FNU Mancha, Sheriff Mike Griffis and others
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beavers v. Griffis et al
as 7:2020cv00190
Defendant:
Cpl. FNU Gonzalez, Chief Deputy FNU Mancha, Sheriff Mike Griffis and others
Plaintiff:
Rusty Melvin Beavers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Griffis et al
as 7:2020cv00189
Defendant:
Chief Deputy FNU Mancha, Sheriff Mike Griffis, Lt. Jesse Abalos and others
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmons v. Gilles et al
as 7:2020cv00185
Defendant:
Midland County, Captain FNU Grahm, Sheriff Deputy FNU Gillette and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Audis Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Hill County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2020cv00648
Defendant:
Sheriff Rodney Watson, Captain Dianne Hammer, Hill County Public Defender's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Oliver White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv00614
Defendant:
Warden Jacqueline Jones, FNU Barker, Sgt. FNU Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Amelia Marie Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez, Jr. v. Peralta
as 5:2020cv00769
Defendant:
Jesus Peralta, Sergeant FNU Valdez, Lieutenant FNU Duran and others
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Alvarez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romo v. TDCJ Wayne Scott Unit et al
as 3:2020cv00160
Respondent:
M. Ross, Officer Lindberg, Officer Partida and others
Petitioner:
Raul Romo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruff v. Marichalar et al
as 7:2020cv00116
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D. Ruff
Defendant:
Captain Steven McNiell, Mike Griffis, Romina Marichalar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quintanilla v. Atascosa County et al
as 5:2020cv00465
Defendant:
Sheriff David Soward, Captain Martin Gonzales and Atascosa County
Plaintiff:
Mario Quintanilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
