Cases 51 - 60 of 19,887
Middleton v. USA
as 2:2024cv00089
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrea C. Middleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tinney v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00455
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ethan Eli Tinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Guillory v. The State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Respondent:
Bexar County Criminal Justice, The State of Texas and Norma Favela Barceleau
Petitioner:
Ronald Guillory, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solis v. Warden Rosales et al
as 1:2024cv01025
Defendant:
Officer Middleton, HSA Hodges and Warden Rosales
Plaintiff:
Humberto Solis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Hughes Unit
as 6:2024cv00451
Defendant:
Hughes Unit
Plaintiff:
Billy Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enriquez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00454
Defendant:
FNU Alexander, Mail Room Off or Staff, FNU Adabola and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burpee v. Comal County
as 1:2024cv01046
Defendant:
Comal County
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Burpee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Lumpkin Case transferred to the Western District of Texas.
as 6:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Lowell DeQuincy Green
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Douglas Eric Hill
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Sanders
Defendant:
District Attorney Joe D. Gonzales and Chief Executive Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
