Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Burgess, II v. Chadwick
as 6:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Burgess, II
Defendant:
Daniel W. Chadwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Burgess
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burgess v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Burgess
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burgess v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv00111
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Burgess v. Davis
as 5:2019cv00541
Petitioner:
Darryn Robert Burgess
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Respondent:
Lorie Davis - Director of the TDCJ-Correctional Institutions Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burgess v. Willis
as 3:2018cv00039
Petitioner:
King Dawud Burgess
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Respondent:
Scott Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wagner v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2015cv00276
Defendant:
Stanley J. Baldwin, Oliver Bell, Richard Burgess and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell W. Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Bexar County, Texas
as 5:2015cv00649
Defendant:
Bexar County, Texas
Plaintiff:
Darryn Robert Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. LaHood et al
as 5:2012cv00691
Plaintiff:
Darryn Robert Burgess
Defendant:
Deputy Chief Roger Dovalina, Classification Cpt. Gonzalez, Judge Michael LaHood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00125
Petitioner:
Benny Ray Burgess
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
