Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Lumsden et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden, Norman Horton, Benjamin Benson and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, C.F. Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denby v. Coleman
as 6:2021cv01318
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denby v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2021cv01300
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director, FNU Garcia, FNU Delapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv01098
Petitioner:
John A Coleman
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burleson et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2020cv01086
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wilson, Chase Burford, Richard D. Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Henderson Unit, Lablanc Unit, Tarrant County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Burdow et al
as 6:2020cv00978
Defendant:
CO Franklin Altum, CO Rose Coleman and Sgt Elder Burdow
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00032
Petitioner:
John Arick Coleman
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coleman v. Seguin et al
as 5:2018cv01003
Plaintiff:
Brandon Coleman
Defendant:
Mark Seguin, L. Rosas and Jim Acuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Erwin
as 6:2016cv00451
Petitioner:
Monica Coleman
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Warden Debbie Erwin
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Pamerleau
as 5:2015cv00748
Petitioner:
Clayborn Coleman
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Sheriff Susan Pamerleau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
