Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Taylor v. Ebersole et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Dylan Eugene Taylor
Defendant:
Miranda B. Ebersole and FNU Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Sarinana
as 5:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Hancock
Defendant:
Police Officer T. Sarinana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Jackson
as 5:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Hancock
Defendant:
JH Jackson and VIA Bus Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Cueto
as 5:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Eugene Castillo
Defendant:
Warden Emundo Cueto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans Jr. v. Unknown District Attorney of Maverick County, Texas
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Oliver Eugene Evans Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown District Attorney of Maverick County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Eugene Daijaion Bell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Hernandez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dobson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Raymond Eugene Dobson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Couch v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Rickey Eugene Couch
Defendant:
David Gutierrez, Rissie Owens and James LaFavers, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Rickey Eugene Couch
Defendant:
David Gutierrez, Rissie Owens and James LaFavers, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
