Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Graham v. TDCJ
as 4:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
John Carlton Graham
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00387
Petitioner:
Michael S. Graham
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. Bureau of Prisons, FCI-La Tuna
as 3:2022cv00348
Petitioner:
Michael S. Graham
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, FCI-La Tuna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maxie v. Graham et al
as 5:2019cv01099
Defendant:
Sgt. Padilla, Cpt. Graham, Maria LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Maxie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Davis
as 1:2019cv00345
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Bobby Everett Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Southwestern Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00357
Defendant:
Nurse Doe 1, Southwestern Corrections, Capt. FNU Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Eugene Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonnenberg v. Davis
as 1:2018cv00450
Respondent:
Laura Davis and Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Graham Jay Sonnenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Uballe v. Ector County Law Enforcement Center Staff, et al
as 7:2017cv00144
Defendant:
Jailer Angie Abalos, Lt. J. Abalos, LVN Beverly Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Robert David Uballe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baylor v. Hierholzer et al
as 5:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Baylor
Defendant:
Silvia Foraker, Eric Graham, William R. Hierholzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Painter et al
as 7:2017cv00067
Defendant:
Jailer Benito Alaniz, John Doe, FNU Domiss and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Luther McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
