Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Basey v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2020cv00756
Plaintiff:
John Lee Basey
Defendant:
S Wolske, Cynithia Lofton, Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Transitional Planning Dept. - Southern Region - Institutional Division
as 7:2019cv00073
Plaintiff:
John Lee Cook
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Transitional Planning Dept. - Southern Region - Institutional Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Gilles et al
as 7:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
John Lee Cook
Defendant:
George D. Jody Gilles and Gary Painter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cockerham, Jr. v. Braggs et al
as 3:2017cv00160
Respondent:
Warden Braggs, Rachel Chapa, Asst. Warden Shacks and others
Petitioner:
John Lee Cockerham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cockerham v. Willis
as 3:2015cv00382
Petitioner:
John Lee Cockerham, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Respondent:
Warden J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Posey v. United States Of America
as 7:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
John Lee Posey
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cockerham v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00957
Plaintiff:
John Lee Cockerham
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cockerham v. Chapa
as 3:2013cv00327
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Petitioner:
John Lee Cockerham, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spinelli v. United States of America
as 5:2011cv00773
Petitioner:
John Lee Spinelli
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
