Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Haapaniemi v. Warden Hijar
as 3:2021cv00309
Petitioner:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi and Peter Lee Norris
Respondent:
Warden Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norris v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Peter Lee Norris and Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Haapaniemi v. Warden Hijar
as 3:2021cv00291
Petitioner:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi and Peter Lee Norris
Respondent:
Warden Hijar and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norris v. Ms. Hjar et al
as 3:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
Peter Lee Norris and Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
Ms. Hjar and Director, et. al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. McCrary et al
as 5:2014cv00163
Defendant:
Sheriff FNU Bouldin, Tim DorryCott, Sammy McCrary and others
Plaintiff:
Marcel Edgar Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. Pilot Gas Station et al
as 5:2014cv00132
Defendant:
Tim Dorrycot, Edward Norris and Pilot Gas Station
Plaintiff:
Marcel Edgar Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. United States Of America
as 6:2013cv00265
Petitioner:
Jacob Thomas Norris
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. Anderson et al
as 1:2013cv00464
Defendant:
American Correctional Association, Kenneth Anderson, Austin Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Curtiss Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00243
Petitioner:
Charles Jerry Norris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hemphill v. Biery et al
as 5:2013cv00153
Defendant:
Fred Biery and Karen Norris
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Hemphill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
