Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Flanagan v. Travis County Criminal Court Judicial District 8 et al
as 1:2024cv00346
Defendant:
Tony Barrera, Margret Kircher, Travis County Criminal Court Judicial District 8 and others
Plaintiff:
Jaban Flanagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantes v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Tony Cervantes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Jimenez et al
as 5:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
Quentin Jones
Defendant:
Attorney Tony Jimenez, II, FNU Figurora, Keefe Commissary Staff Member and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuentes v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Tony Fuentes
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fuentes v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Tony Fuentes
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sparks v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Tony Sparks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sparks v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Tony Sparks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv01141
Petitioner:
Tony Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv01199
Petitioner:
Tony Ramirez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Leon Tony Parker
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Michael Alsobrook and Captain Daniel Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
