Cases 91 - 100 of 181
FILING ERROR
as 1:2020cv00831
Defendant:
Board member Anthony Ramirez, Board member David G. Gutierrez, Board member Chuck Speier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Collier
as 7:2020cv00188
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Judd Wicks Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Collier - TDCJ Director et al
as 1:2020cv00515
Defendant:
David G. Guitierrez, Anthony Ramirez, Chuck Speier and others
Plaintiff:
Narciso N Garcia, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Collier et al
as 6:2020cv00380
Defendant:
Karen Stroleny, Bryan Collier and Jennifer Cosby
Plaintiff:
Lana Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thoele et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2020cv00364
Defendant:
Warden Deborah Cockerall, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Daniel Thoele, Ruben Ybanez, Gregory Boone and others
Amicus Curiae:
Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsh v. Speier et al
as 5:2020cv00133
Defendant:
Anthony Ramirez, Pamela Thielke, Frank Solis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Marsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peucker v. Abott et al
as 1:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Rebecca Cox, Leeroy Cano, Jeffery Catoe and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Peucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClure v. Paxton et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Jennifer Tharp, John #4 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2019cv01456
Defendant:
Jennifer Tharp, Jessi Valdez, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert T. McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Collier
as 5:2019cv01435
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jesus Rivera and Jesus Rivera
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
