Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Cox et al v. Bank of America Corporation, N.A. et al
as 5:2011cv00986
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, N.A. and Prime Lending, A Plains Capital Company
Plaintiff:
Bradley Cox and Tammy Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Vallance et al v. Zipp et al
as 5:2011cv00688
Plaintiff:
Daryl A. Zipp, Kahalil Mortezagholi and DASA Property Management, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Walter S. Vallance and Elizabeth J. Smith
3Rd Party Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, L.L.P, Mary A. Daffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 6:2011cv00099
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LLP and Bank of America Corporation
Plaintiff:
Keith Wayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lewis v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00799
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP fka Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and Bank of America Corporation
Plaintiff:
Joann Antal Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zapotosky v. Bank of America Corporation
as 1:2010cv00347
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Plaintiff:
Robert Zapotosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Montalvo v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00360
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Bank of America Corporation and W.A. Marty LaCouture
Plaintiff:
Lisette Montalvo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
