Cases 21 - 30 of 1,179
Morgan v. Rosalez
as 1:2024cv00408
Petitioner:
Gatlin Gary Morgan
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chavez v. Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
as 3:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Raul Chavez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Enriquez v. Mares
as 6:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Respondent:
Warden FNU Mares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00395
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McBride v. Enge
as 1:2024cv00379
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Warden Jamadre L. Enge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rudluff v. Rosalez
as 1:2024cv00373
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Steven Rudluff
Respondent:
Warden G. Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rios v. Unidentified Corrections Officer et al
as 5:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Thomas Christopher Rios
Defendant:
Unidentified Corrections Officer, U.T.M.B Dominguez State Jail Staff, TDCJ Dominguez State Jail Prison Unit Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Andrews (Hayward) et al
as 5:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Warden Terry Andrews (Hayward), UTMB- Buluti, UTMB-Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hemphill v. Barry
as 5:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Hemphill
Respondent:
Warden Waymond Barry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
